Now now Suave, let's not forget that Panasonic still makes the best TVs available right now and that every year's new sets show performance improvements over the previous year's models.
Let's not also forget that Kuro technology was expensive to implement and that Pioneer made essentially a niche product that could not survive the economic downturn of 2008-09. Should Panasonic be throwing resources at a product that would assuredly be a money loser (especially if it meant having to retool its factories to adapt to a radically different panel than what Panasonic is currently making), or try to raise the performance of its premium, yet still affordable, TVs?


Reply With Quote
